Overview
How could prediction markets impact TV viewership? Why are philosophical concepts trending online? And is the quantification of daily lives doing more harm than good? Below are our January 2026 consumer trends: three topics on our radar this month and their impact on people. By scanning the headlines, keeping tabs on social media conversations and tuning into the zeitgeist, we connect the dots between our trends and the wider world so that you can make sense of what’s happening now and what it means for you.
Key insights
- Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket may impact live TV viewership. In 2025, the Super Bowl drew a record 127.7 million viewers, and the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade attracted 34.3 million viewers – another record. Beyond consumers seeking communal experiences, another factor at play could be prediction markets, and bettors looking to watch their fortunes grow in real time.
- Philosophy is attracting new audiences as consumers seek to reclaim cognitive control from algorithms. Psychologist @blussomly’s “stoicism but make it cute” series has amassed over 100,000 followers and millions of views on TikTok.
- Conflicting signals are raising questions about the benefits of tracking and monitoring personal metrics. C Thi Nguyen, author of new book The Score, has coined the term “value capture” to express the idea that the metrics used to track progress can become more important in an individual’s mind than the overall objective, so much so that it can “redefine your core sense of what’s important”.
1. Prediction markets are turning live TV into high-stakes entertainment

Even amid the rise of streaming, live TV viewing is reaching new heights
If you thought consumers were losing interest in live televised events, think again. In the US, Nielsen data shows a notable uptick in viewership of major live TV events in 2025. The Super Bowl drew a record 127.7 million viewers, the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade attracted 34.3 million viewers (another record), and almost 45 million viewers tuned into the three NFL games that took place on Thanksgiving Day.
While Axios attributes this shift to “how much audiences are craving communal, real-time experiences”, there could be another, less obvious factor at play. Enter: prediction markets.
Prediction markets could keep this momentum going
Over the past two years, prediction markets have boomed: they’ve reportedly grown 130 times in size, with the value of bets placed increasing from $100 million to $13 billion a month. Luana Lopes Lara, the 29-year-old co-founder of prediction market Kalshi, recently became the youngest self-made female billionaire, unseating Taylor Swift. And in October, the youngest male self-made billionaire was 28-year-old Shayne Coplan, founder of another prediction market, Polymarket.
What makes these platforms so successful is their model: they allow consumers to make bets on everything from election outcomes to quarterly earnings reports, weather events, industry awards and much more. Easily accessible and with a gamified interface, they combine useful information with fun – not to mention attractive financial incentives. For those bettors eager to see first-hand whether they’ve made a successful wager, tuning into events such as the Super Bowl becomes about more than just entertainment – it’s about potentially watching their fortunes grow in real time.
Attitudes toward this kind of betting are somewhat polarized
Our data shows that consumers are relatively torn when it comes to the moral acceptability of betting on real-life events such as extreme weather events: 36% globally agree that it’s acceptable, and 30% disagree. Millennials are the most likely to agree. As these markets become more mainstream, we could see attitudes shift towards more positivity.
However, the ethics of betting on major geopolitical events remain murky, and accusations of insider trading abound. One anonymous bettor sparked controversy when they raked in more than $400,000 after betting that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro would soon be out of office, mere hours before the leader was captured by US troops.
How can media brands capitalize on the rise of prediction markets?
Redesign series and live broadcasts for the ultimate emotional payoff. Consumers have long enjoyed the excitement and immediacy of live events. If prediction markets continue to gain steam, we may see this trend become even stronger. Media brands can play into this by creating “moment of truth” content that heightens anticipation before the big reveal.
Partner with prediction platforms to capitalize on the hype and encourage deeper viewer engagement. Already, Polymarket has struck up partnerships with the Golden Globes, Dow Jones and sports and entertainment company TKO, while Kalshi has forged deals with CNN, CNBC and the NHL to provide real-time insights on their events. Consider what role crowd-sourced, predictive insights could play for your brand and whether integrating these into the viewing experience would resonate with your audiences.
2. Philosophy’s comeback, and why critical thinking is the new cool

Critical thinking is staging a return
We’re witnessing an unexpected cultural shift: philosophy is having a mainstream moment. After years of algorithmic content feeding consumers bite-sized dopamine hits, there’s a counter-movement emerging. From New York Philosophy Club’s weekly discussions drawing Gen Z crowds, to psychologist @blussomly’s “stoicism but make it cute” series amassing over 100,000 followers and millions of views, to the popularity of the University of Pennsylvania course consisting of eight-hour, in-person gatherings where attendees read and then discuss a book, consumers are actively seeking intellectual depth.
@blussomly GIRLIE stop making your life harder than it has to be by worrying about stuff you can’t control!! 🙇♀️ #stoicism #stoicismforwomen #psychology #mindset #motivation #selfhelp #selfcare #mentalwellness #anxiety #overthinking #worrying #presentation #reframe #reminder #fyppp
♬ Green Gramophone soundtrack from Hello Neighbour – timaeqq
Consumers are craving complexity
Converging forces are driving this phenomenon. First, there’s growing awareness of the mechanics of algorithms and the attention economy, which in turn drives a desire to reclaim cognitive control. Secondly, AI’s rapid integration into daily life is driving acute tech anxiety, raising urgent questions about human purpose, ethics and creativity that philosophy may be equipped to address. Third, consumers are experiencing content exhaustion: they’re tired of shallow engagement and craving substance. Long-form content is resurging; not despite shortened attention spans, but because of them – people want to prove to themselves they can still engage deeply.
Philosophy as operating system
Podcasts such as Philosophize This! that break down complex philosophical concepts in accessible ways are proliferating, while Substacks like Philosophical Convictions and Commonplace Philosophy are recommending reading lists for 2026 that blend classical texts with contemporary applications. Stoicism in particular has become a lens for managing digital overwhelm, uncertainty, and loss of control – issues that resonate deeply in the current digital context. Consumers are adopting enduring philosophical frameworks as practical toolkits for navigating contemporary challenges.
And while consumers are using philosophical concepts to understand, and sometimes challenge, technological development, tech leaders are using them to explain and justify business decisions. For example, OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman has discussed balancing safety and capability through ethical frameworks when considering AI trade-offs, while Peter Thiel draws on René Girard’s mimetic theory to explain competition and innovation. Meanwhile, figures like businessman Marc Andreessen have used accelerationism – the idea that technology should advance as rapidly as possible – to frame their approach to AI development.
How should brands connect to consumers as philosophy gains new traction?
Position your brand as a facilitator of deeper engagement rather than just an attention-seeker. This might mean creating content that rewards sustained focus and learning or developing products and campaigns that acknowledge complexity rather than oversimplifying. Brands have an opportunity to support consumers’ desire for upskilling – in philosophy and beyond.
Avoid superficially co-opting philosophical language. While digestible explainer content can help those new to philosophy understand complex concepts more quickly, the proliferation of such content on social media could risk philosophies being diluted or misunderstood. This could lead to a backlash similar to the pushback against “therapy-speak” if consumers cherry-pick the elements that fit their personal narrative but don’t truly understand the philosophical frameworks they are engaging and so don’t apply them in the best or most positive ways. To avoid this, ensure your brand and team fully understand any concepts being highlighted, and consciously contribute to more thoughtful discourse while creating space for reflection.
Support the pursuit of intellectual engagement as self-care. Consumers want to recapture and refocus their attention on the things that matter, and engage with slower, deeper questions at their own pace. This won’t necessarily be easy, and one route consumers may choose is to supplement with nootropics to support their concentration.
3. Consumers count the potential costs of over-quantification

Conflicting signals raise questions about the benefits of tracking and monitoring
The new year again brought with it for many a desire to optimize various aspects of life, including health, wealth and organization. Many of these involve quantification and tracking, covering metrics such as movement, saving, time use and more. And while tech and AI mean there are more tools to help than ever before, there have again been warnings that quantification and monitoring may do more harm than good.
Quantifying the year just gone grows exponentially

